Top JPMorgan bankers hosting Romney fund-raiser says the headline. The article goes on to imply there might be influence peddling on the menu of the fundraising dinner. Amazing that during the 2008 Obama campaign it was rarely, if ever, reported that Barack Obama received many times the amount of Wall Street/Banker donations to his campaign than McCain did.
Does this duplicity bother me? Only in that it is not done honestly. They choose what they will report or not report, how they will report it or not, all under the guise of objective reporting. If Journalist were hones about there allegiance or biases then report however they wish.
Currently Wall Street and Bankers have been getting a bad rap in the press so mentioning both a wall street firm and the term banker in the headline automatically puts Candidate Rominey's fundraising unfairly in question to many readers. All I ask is that journalist and editors be honest or be fair in their rep
Does this duplicity bother me? Only in that it is not done honestly. They choose what they will report or not report, how they will report it or not, all under the guise of objective reporting. If Journalist were hones about there allegiance or biases then report however they wish.
Currently Wall Street and Bankers have been getting a bad rap in the press so mentioning both a wall street firm and the term banker in the headline automatically puts Candidate Rominey's fundraising unfairly in question to many readers. All I ask is that journalist and editors be honest or be fair in their rep